First, let us start with the dictionary
definition of conserve: to keep from being
damaged, lost or wasted; to save keep,
or preserve. In politics, a conservative
is defined as someone tending to conserve
or preserve established traditions or institutions.
Now let us ask a leading question. Is
it worthwhile to conserve or be a conservative?
George Santayana, Spanish-American poet
and teacher of philosophy at Harvard University,
wrote in his book Reason in Common Sense: "Those
who cannot remember the past are condemned
to repeat it."
I am a child of the Great Depression -
oldest child of a mother set adrift in
that economic disaster with three youngsters.
One week we lived on a peck of dried peas
- morning, noon and night - which my mother,
in great humiliation, obtained from the
government surplus food depot.
I mention these painful, personal memories
so that you will understand I am not unmindful
of the hardships of poverty and circumstance,
or the role of government in mitigating
disaster.
I cast my first vote for Franklin Delano
Roosevelt - believing then, and still today
- that government has a responsibility
to "prime the pump" in great
emergencies.
Unfortunately, when Democrats discovered
the vote - getting power of free, social
services, they would not return to the
requirement of individual responsibilities.
In 1951, while lunching at the National
Press Club in Washington, D.C., President
Truman and his press secretary came in
and took stools at the bar next to our
table. After sandwich and soup, the president
turned and said hello to my host. With
this we engaged the president in conversation.
That morning, a headline on the front
page of the "Washington Post" was
-- "Inflation Hits 3 percent." None
of us in the group had ever heard of inflation.
So I said, "Mr. President, excuse
my ignorance, but what is inflation?
Mr. Truman smiled and replied, "Don't
apologize. I was asked that same question
at the cabinet meeting this morning. I
explained it was like a hunter stung by
a bee -- and here he told a locker-room
joke, the gist of which was the hunter's
desire for a salve that would remove the
sting but leave the swelling.
I laughed, but I realized he was deliberately
pumping up inflation for political gain
- by running the printing presses overtime
at the Bureau of Engraving.
Truman already had confiscated the real
cash in the Social Security Insurance Fund
to help pay for World War II, replacing
the insurance reserve with I.O.U s. Thus,
the hedge against old age retirement ceased
being insurance and became a "trust." Some
of you may recall the liberal argument: "There
is nothing to worry about. We owe it to
ourselves."
I became alarmed, because common sense
told me that Social Security, and even
the nation, would go bankrupt if inflation
- at 1 percent, or whatever - continued
indefinitely. That's when I became a conservative.
When Social Security approached its first
short-fall in the early sixties, I wrote
a column warning about the impending crisis.
The amount of angry response by readers,
including some close friends who should
have grasped the facts, astonished me.
I was called irresponsible for suggesting
that Social Security was in trouble.
However, the Washington politicians fessed
up a year later and raised the employee/employer
Social Security taxes for the first time.
Such increases have occurred periodically
every since. Another is needed right now,
as is Medicare and Medicaid.
The critical problem is that working-and-saving
Americans now must cough up to government
- federal, state, and local - at least
a third of what they earn. I am a student
of history, and I have learned that all
previous civilizations have collapsed when
approximately 40 percent of the fruits
of producers go to support non-producers
- government functionaries being the largest
non-productive consumers.
We are closer to the edge than our politicians
like to admit. In our time, the Soviet
Union slipped over the edge. The Communist
Manifesto - "to each according to
need, from each according to ability" -
has a wonderful, compassionate ring. But
socialism always has been a nation-killer,
and liberalism is nothing more than slow-motion
socialism.
The United States national debt is 5 and
1/2 trillion dollars. Interest on this
debt takes the top 35 percent of federal
taxes. Social services that the borrowed
money provided has been consumed and forgotten.
If we balanced the federal budget next
year, and every year forever, we would
never escape the 35 percent overburden
on our federal revenue without repudiating
the debt, or confiscating your and my savings
by drastic devaluation of our money.
Don't laugh! President Nixon did it overnight
in a small way. Mexico and Russia did it
last year big time. Inflation does it more
slowly, but just as surely. How much did
you pay for your last home or car that
20 years ago cost one-fourth as much?
We must move on from balancing the budget
and start working earnestly toward reducing
the national debt. It's the economy, stupid.
After the economy, the principal problems
plaguing the nation center around the liberal
dissipation of established traditions and
institutions.
We have destroyed the family and the work
ethic with no-questions-asked welfare,
encouragement of out-of-wedlock teen-age
pregnancies with free condoms in school
and welfare after delivery that rewards
the disappearance of impregnators We have
dumbed down education with the hope of
keeping kids in school - but, still, the
drop-out rate in inner-city schools is
45 percent and unemployment of young, black
males is 55 percent. A lost generation.
Pornography and gutter language is common
on prime- time television. Teen-age drug
addiction is soaring. Street violence is
commonplace.
Liberals laugh at morality, family values,
religious faith, hard work, high educational
standards, courtesy, patriotism, chaste
sexual conduct, individual responsibility,
pre-marital abstinence, polite language.
To conserve, one has to be smart enough
to know what to keep and preserve from
10,000 years of civilization, so we don't
keep repeating grievous mistakes. Our nation,
our culture, our civilization depends on
conservatism - either to save what is good
and workable, or to rescue us from anarchy
when the nation goes belly up.
I close by recommending the "Serenity
Prayer" delivered at the height of
the Great Depression - by Reinhold Niebuhr,
the famous American clergyman:
"God grant us the courage to change
things we can, accept the things we cannot,
and the wisdom to know the difference."